Blazer RS AWD vs Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180 km/h
6
4
3596 cc
1996 cc
American
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4874 mm
4914 mm
1948 mm
2207 mm
1701 mm
1842 mm
2870 mm
2900 mm
863 L
259 L
190 mm
225 m
Fuel Economy
73 L
80 L
8 Km/L
12 Km/L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
9 Speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
3.6 L
2.0 L - 2.3 L
305 BHP
170 BHP - 296 BHP
Automatic
10-Speed Selectshift AT & 6-Speed Selectshift AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
3.6 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Diesel
3.6L V6
/
4
4
308 BHP
170 BHP
274 Nm
405 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Blazer RS AWD
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Blazer RS AWD if you care more about power; choose Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Blazer RS AWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Blazer RS AWD has a wheelbase of 2870 mm , while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Blazer RS AWD uses All Wheel Drive , while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel uses Four Wheel Drive.