Blazer RS AWD vs Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
240 km/h
6
6
3596 cc
3500 cc
American
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
8 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4874 mm
5334 mm
1948 mm
2006 mm
1701 mm
1930 mm
2870 mm
3111 mm
863 L
530 L
190 mm
250 m
Fuel Economy
73 L
88 L
8 Km/L
11 Km/L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
9 Speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.6 L
3.5 L - 5.4 L
193 BHP - 305 BHP
300 BHP - 440
Automatic
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
6 Seater - 8
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
V
3.6 L
3.5 L
Petrol
Gasoline
3.6L V6
/
4
4
308 BHP
380 BHP
274 Nm
637 Nm
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Blazer RS AWD
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Blazer RS AWD if you care more about overall equipment; choose Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Blazer RS AWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Blazer RS AWD has a wheelbase of 2870 mm , while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a wheelbase of 3111 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Blazer RS AWD uses All Wheel Drive , while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive.