Blazer RS FWD vs Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

190 km/h

6

6

3596 cc

/

American

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7

5 Doors

5 Doors

4874 mm

4828 mm

1948 mm

1943 mm

1701 mm

1792 mm

2870 mm

2916 mm

863 L

782 L

190 mm

/

Fuel Economy

73 L

23 Gallon/ 87L

8 Km/L

10 Km/L

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Smart Keyless Entry

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

Standard

2nd Row Manual 60:40 Split

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS)

/

Blind Spot Information System

Infotainment

/

Android LCD

/

/

Transmission

9 Speed AT

8AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Torsion Beam with Coil Springs

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.6 L

3.6 L - 6.4 L

193 BHP - 305 BHP

286 BHP - 707 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Black

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.6 L

3.6 L

Petrol

Gasoline

3.6L V6

3.6L V6

4

/

308 BHP

293 BHP

274 Nm

350 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Blazer RS FWD

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Versatility of options for powerful engines
  • Impressive off-road driving capabilities
  • High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies

Negative

  • High fuel consumption for some models
  • High price compared to some competitors
  • Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGrand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Blazer RS FWD if you care more about overall equipment; choose Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Blazer RS FWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Blazer RS FWD has a wheelbase of 2870 mm , while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a wheelbase of 2916 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Blazer RS FWD uses Front Wheel Drive , while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo uses All Wheel Drive.