1 Series 2025 120i vs Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
222
/
4
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4329
/
1984
/
1440
/
2690
/
360
/
Fuel Economy
16.9
17.8
52
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.6
/
177 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
177 BHP
151 BHP
250
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
1 Series 2025 120i
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 1 Series 2025 120i if you care more about power; choose Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 1 Series 2025 120i has a fuel consumption of 5.92, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a fuel consumption of 5.62. Therefore, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 1 Series 2025 120i has a wheelbase of 2690, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 1 Series 2025 120i uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure uses No data.