840i M Sport 2025 vs Audi e-tron 2024 95 kWh Quattro Comparison

Car Information

5.2

5.7

Engine / Motor

250

200

8

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

4

5 Seater

5082

4901

1932

1935

1407

1616

3023

2928

440

660

Fuel Economy

13.8

/

68

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

/

/

/

Rear Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

3.0

/

340 BHP

402 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

4

5 Seater

/

TBD

/

356 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0

/

Gasoline

Electric

340 BHP

402 BHP

500

664

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 840i M Sport 2025

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Audi e-tron 2024 95 kWh Quattro

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAudi e-tron 2024 95 kWh Quattro

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 840i M Sport 2025 if you care more about interior space; choose Audi e-tron 2024 95 kWh Quattro if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

BMW | 840i M Sport 2025

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Corvette 2023 6.2L 3LT Coupe

BMW | 840i M Sport 2025

VS

Chevrolet | Corvette 6.2L 3LT Coupe

BMW | 840i M Sport 2025

VS

Ford | Ford Mustang 2020 5.2l Shelby GT500

BMW | 840i M Sport 2025

VS

Ford | Ford Mustang 2021 5.2l Shelby GT500

BMW | 840i M Sport 2025

VS

Dodge | Dodge Challenger 2024 6.2L Hellcat Red Eye A/T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 840i M Sport 2025 has a fuel consumption of 7.25, while Audi e-tron 2024 95 kWh Quattro has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 840i M Sport 2025 has a wheelbase of 3023, while Audi e-tron 2024 95 kWh Quattro has a wheelbase of 2928. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 840i M Sport 2025, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 840i M Sport 2025 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Audi e-tron 2024 95 kWh Quattro uses All Wheel Drive.