BMW X6M 2019 4.4T xDrive vs EHS9 Deluxe (6 Seats) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
/
8
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
6 Seater
✓
/
4.909
5209 mm
1.969
2010 mm
1.699
1731 mm
2.933
3110 mm
550
/
Fuel Economy
9.0
/
85
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.4 L
/
555 BHP - 617 BHP
429 BHP - 543 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
4 Seater - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km - 515 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
4.4 L
/
Petrol
Electric
575 BHP
543 BHP
750
750 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
BMW X6M 2019 4.4T xDrive
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
EHS9 Deluxe (6 Seats)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent power performance and control
- Unique and attractive exterior design
- A luxurious interior, equipped with technology
Negative
- High fuel consumption and high maintenance costs
- Driving comfort is less due to stiff suspension
- High purchase price
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS9 Deluxe (6 Seats)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BMW X6M 2019 4.4T xDrive if you care more about power; choose EHS9 Deluxe (6 Seats) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BMW X6M 2019 4.4T xDrive has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while EHS9 Deluxe (6 Seats) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BMW X6M 2019 4.4T xDrive has a wheelbase of 2.933, while EHS9 Deluxe (6 Seats) has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Deluxe (6 Seats), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BMW X6M 2019 4.4T xDrive uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Deluxe (6 Seats) uses All Wheel Drive.