XM 2025 V8 vs Range Rover SE P360 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
8
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5110
/
2210
/
1755
/
3105
/
Fuel Economy
69
/
/
8.5
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
4.4 L - 4.4 L
3.0 L - 5.0 L
653 BHP
360 BHP - 525 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
4.4
3.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
653 BHP
360 BHP
800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
XM 2025 V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Cool box
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Temperature Display
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Front Crumple Zone
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Front and Rear Crumple Zone
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Range Rover SE P360 3.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRange Rover SE P360 3.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XM 2025 V8 if you care more about power; choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XM 2025 V8 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XM 2025 V8 has a wheelbase of 3105, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XM 2025 V8 uses No data, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data.