Bronco 2025 Badlands 2.7L vs Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
240 km/h
6
6
2698 cc
3500 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5
8 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4800 mm
5334 mm
1937 mm
2006 mm
1962 mm
1930 mm
2950 mm
3111 mm
562 L
530 L
260 m
250 m
Fuel Economy
9.2 Km/L
11 Km/L
79 L
88 L
9.2 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
12
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
7
8
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.3 L - 2.7 L
3.5 L - 5.4 L
270 BHP - 330 BHP
300 BHP - 440
Automatic
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 - 5
6 Seater - 8
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
V
2.7
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
330 BHP
380 BHP
542 Nm
637 Nm
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Bronco 2025 Badlands 2.7L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Bronco 2025 Badlands 2.7L if you care more about overall equipment; choose Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Bronco 2025 Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Bronco 2025 Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a wheelbase of 3111 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Bronco 2025 Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive.