CarteaCompare CarsBronco Badlands 2.7L vs Hino 300

Bronco Badlands 2.7L vs Hino 300 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

/

6

/

2698 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

3

4 Doors

/

4800 mm

4,765

1937 mm

1,880

1962 mm

2,200

2950 mm

3,430

562 L

/

260 m

/

Fuel Economy

9.2 Km/L

6.6 km/L

79 L

/

9.2 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

7

/

Transmission

/

6-speed Manual transmission

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

2.3 L - 3.0 L

4.0 L

181 - 418 BHP

147

8-speed Automatic & Automatic

6-speed Manual transmission

Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel

TBD

TBD

4 - 5

3

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

2.7 L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Diesel

4

/

330 BHP

147

542 Nm

420

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Hino 300

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Attractive and iconic design
    • Excellent off-road capabilities
    • Multiple engine options

    Negative

    • High price for top categories
    • Limited internal storage space
    • Significant fuel consumption

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickHino 300

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about fuel economy; choose Hino 300 if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Ford | Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 3.6L 4 Door

    Ford | Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    VS

    Audi | Q5 45 TFSI quattro Advanced 2.0L (245 HP)

    Ford | Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    VS

    Genesis | Genesis GV80 2023 2.5T Premium

    Ford | Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 4.0L GXR

    Ford | Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87, while Hino 300 has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, Bronco Badlands 2.7L is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm, while Hino 300 has a wheelbase of 3,430. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hino 300, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive, while Hino 300 uses No data.