BX7 2.0T AWD Full Option (5-Seater) vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4715 mm
4341 mm
1911 mm
1804 mm
1690 mm
1693 mm
2760 mm
2676 mm
545 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
60 L
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
224 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
224 BHP
115 BHP
300 Nm
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
BX7 2.0T AWD Full Option (5-Seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBX7 2.0T AWD Full Option (5-Seater)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BX7 2.0T AWD Full Option (5-Seater) if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BX7 2.0T AWD Full Option (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BX7 2.0T AWD Full Option (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2760 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BX7 2.0T AWD Full Option (5-Seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BX7 2.0T AWD Full Option (5-Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.