BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) vs BYD Ti7 Design Comparison

Car Information

/

5.3

/

80

/

26.6

Engine / Motor

206 km/h

190

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4715 mm

5016

1911 mm

1995

1690 mm

1865

2760 mm

2920

545 L

1800L

/

2425

/

19"

/

5.7

/

190

/

24

/

25

Fuel Economy

60 L

60

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

All Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

PU

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

54

/

6.6

Transmission

/

AT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

AWD

/

Double wishbone type

/

Five-link

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated

/

Ventilated

/

60 /255 R19

/

60 /255 R19

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5T / PHEV

224 BHP

480

Automatic

AT

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5T / PHEV

Gasoline

Hybrid

224 BHP

480

300 Nm

630

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport / Normal / Eco

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • BYD Ti7 Design

    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
    • Remote Central Door Locking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickBX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) if you care more about price; choose BYD Ti7 Design if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Borgward | BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Borgward | BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Borgward | BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Borgward | BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Borgward | BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of No data, while BYD Ti7 Design has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2760 mm, while BYD Ti7 Design has a wheelbase of 2920. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BYD Ti7 Design, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while BYD Ti7 Design uses Four-Wheel Drive.