BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) vs C4 Feel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4715 mm
4360 mm
1911 mm
2032 mm
1690 mm
1525 mm
2760 mm
2670 mm
545 L
380 L
Fuel Economy
60 L
50 L
/
17.9 Km/L
/
17.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.2 L - 1.6 L
224 BHP
155 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
224 BHP
155 BHP
300 Nm
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
C4 Feel
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC4 Feel
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) if you care more about interior space; choose C4 Feel if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of No data, while C4 Feel has a fuel consumption of 5.59. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2760 mm, while C4 Feel has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while C4 Feel uses Front Wheel Drive.