BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) vs C5 2025 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
180 km/h
/
4
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4715 mm
4400
1911 mm
1830
1690 mm
1588
2760 mm
2630
545 L
360/1075
/
1381
/
5
Fuel Economy
60 L
51
/
11.2
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
224 BHP
156 - 197
Automatic
7 Speed DCT & 7DCT & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
224 BHP
156 BHP
300 Nm
230
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Sport
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
C5 2025 Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) if you care more about price; choose C5 2025 Comfort if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of No data, while C5 2025 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2760 mm, while C5 2025 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2630. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while C5 2025 Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.