BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
180 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4715 mm
4545 mm
1911 mm
1856 mm
1690 mm
1668 mm
2760 mm
2680 mm
545 L
470 L
Fuel Economy
60 L
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
224 BHP
165 BHP - 248
Automatic
8AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
224 BHP
165 BHP
300 Nm
265 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) if you care more about price; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2760 mm, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.