BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) vs AITO 9- 5 seater Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4715 mm
5230
1911 mm
1999
1690 mm
1800
2760 mm
3110
545 L
/
/
22"
/
5
Fuel Economy
60 L
65L
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
16
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Intelligent air suspension
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5L
224 BHP
496 hp
Automatic
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Galaxy
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
224 BHP
496 hp
300 Nm
675Front:315/Rear:360
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Technologies
✓
/
/
192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar
/
12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Comparison of configuration highlights
BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
AITO 9- 5 seater
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) if you care more about overall equipment; choose AITO 9- 5 seater if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of No data, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2760 mm, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AITO 9- 5 seater , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (5-Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while AITO 9- 5 seater uses Four-Wheel Drive.