C 43 AMG 4MATIC vs Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
250 km/h
4
8
1990 cc
5038 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4 Doors
2 Doors
4,751 mm
4784 mm
1,820 mm
2080 mm
1,438 mm
1391 mm
2865 mm
2710 mm
/
383 L
/
137 m
Fuel Economy
10.6
8.6 Km/L
66
60 L
/
8.6 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
9-speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.3 L - 5.2 L
402 BHP - 680 BHP
300 BHP - 760 BHP
9-speed Automatic & 9-speed automatic (AMG SPEEDSHIFT) + 2-speed for electric drive unit & Automatic
10 Speed AT / 6 Speed MT & Automatic & Manual
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
2 Seater - 4
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 T
5.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged inline-4 + mild hybrid (48 V)
/
Single Turbo
None
4
4
408 BHP
486 BHP
500 Nm
567 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
C 43 AMG 4MATIC
Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C 43 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C 43 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 9.43, while Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T has a fuel consumption of 11.63. Therefore, C 43 AMG 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C 43 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2865 mm, while Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T has a wheelbase of 2710 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C 43 AMG 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C 43 AMG 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Mustang GT 5.0L (486 HP) Coupe M/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.