C 63 AMG vs Mustang 2025 GT 5.0 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
250 km/h
/
8
/
5038 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
/
4
/
19
/
2 Doors
/
4784
/
2080
/
1391
/
2710
/
383 L
/
137
Fuel Economy
/
8.6 km/L(MT) | 9.2 km/L(AT)
/
60 L
/
8.6 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
12.4
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
Cloth with Vinyl Trim Buckets
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
/
10 Speed AT / 6 Speed MT
Chassis & Steering
/
Magne Ride Damping System
/
Rear Drive
/
MacPherson-Strut Double Ball-Joint
/
Independent Integral-Link
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
Brembo
/
255/40 R19
/
275/40 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.3 L - 5.2 L
402 BHP - 680 BHP
300 BHP - 760 BHP
9-speed Automatic & 9-speed automatic (AMG SPEEDSHIFT) + 2-speed for electric drive unit & Automatic
10 Speed AT / 6 Speed MT & Automatic & Manual
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
2 Seater - 4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
V
/
5.0
/
Gasoline
/
Naturally Aspirated
/
5.0L Ti-VCT V8 (4th Gen)
/
4
/
486 BHP
/
567 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
Normal, Sport, Slippery, Track, Drag Strip, Custom Mode
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
C 63 AMG
Mustang 2025 GT 5.0
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C 63 AMG if you care more about price; choose Mustang 2025 GT 5.0 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C 63 AMG has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mustang 2025 GT 5.0 has a fuel consumption of 11.63. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C 63 AMG has a wheelbase of No data, while Mustang 2025 GT 5.0 has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C 63 AMG uses No data, while Mustang 2025 GT 5.0 uses Rear Drive.