C 63 AMG S E Performance vs Granturismo 4.7L V8 Sport Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
280
299 km/h
Dimensions
5
4 Seater
4 Doors
/
4,842 mm
4881 mm
2,033 mm
2056 mm
1,458 mm
1353 mm
2,875 mm
2942 mm
/
260 L
Fuel Economy
14.5
6.5 Km/L
60 L
86 L
11 Km/L
6.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic (AMG SPEEDSHIFT) + 2-speed for electric drive unit
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
4.2 L - 4.7 L
402 BHP - 680 BHP
405 BHP - 460 BHP
9-speed Automatic & 9-speed automatic (AMG SPEEDSHIFT) + 2-speed for electric drive unit & Automatic
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
4 Seater
Engine
Hybrid
Gasoline
680 BHP
460 BHP
1,020 Nm
520 Nm
/
4.7 L
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
C 63 AMG S E Performance
Granturismo 4.7L V8 Sport
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGranturismo 4.7L V8 Sport
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C 63 AMG S E Performance if you care more about fuel economy; choose Granturismo 4.7L V8 Sport if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C 63 AMG S E Performance has a fuel consumption of 6.9, while Granturismo 4.7L V8 Sport has a fuel consumption of 15.38. Therefore, C 63 AMG S E Performance is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C 63 AMG S E Performance has a wheelbase of 2,875 mm , while Granturismo 4.7L V8 Sport has a wheelbase of 2942 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Granturismo 4.7L V8 Sport, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C 63 AMG S E Performance uses All Wheel Drive , while Granturismo 4.7L V8 Sport uses Rear Wheel Drive.