C11 Extended Range vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
185 km/h
Chinese
Chinese
/
4
/
1998 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4750 mm
4781 mm
1905 mm
1920 mm
1650 mm
1671 mm
2930 mm
2815 mm
375 L
500 L
180 m
187 m
Fuel Economy
/
16 Km/L
/
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
8
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
536 BHP
261 BHP
700 Nm
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
7.5
/
options.Lithium
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
2.0 L
/
261 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
C11 Extended Range
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRX Comfort 2.0T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C11 Extended Range if you care more about interior space; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C11 Extended Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C11 Extended Range has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C11 Extended Range, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C11 Extended Range uses All Wheel Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.