C200 vs Arrizo 6 Pro Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
246 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4751 mm
4790
1820 mm
1843
1437 mm
1469
2,865 mm
2670
540 L
/
118 m
/
/
1340
/
17 inch
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
66 L
48
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.6
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
8
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Solid Disc
/
Electronic Parking
/
205/55 R16
/
205/55 R16
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5
204 BHP - 451 BHP
156
9-speed Automatic & 9-speed automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
204 BHP
156
310 Nm
230
/
Turbocharge
/
115
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
C200
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Arrizo 6 Pro
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electric Locks
- 360 Degree Camera
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C200 if you care more about interior space; choose Arrizo 6 Pro if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C200 has a fuel consumption of 10, while Arrizo 6 Pro has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C200 has a wheelbase of 2,865 mm, while Arrizo 6 Pro has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C200 , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C200 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Arrizo 6 Pro uses Front Drive.