C200 vs CTS 2.0L Turbo Base Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
246 km/h
240 km/h
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4751 mm
4966 mm
1820 mm
1834 mm
1437 mm
1453 mm
2,865 mm
2911 mm
540 L
388 L
118 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
66 L
72 L
10 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
8
/
Transmission
9-speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 6.2 L
204 BHP - 451 BHP
268 BHP - 640 BHP
9-speed Automatic & 9-speed automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
204 BHP
268 BHP
310 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
C200
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
CTS 2.0L Turbo Base
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C200 if you care more about fuel economy; choose CTS 2.0L Turbo Base if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C200 has a fuel consumption of 10, while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, C200 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C200 has a wheelbase of 2,865 mm, while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base has a wheelbase of 2911 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CTS 2.0L Turbo Base, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C200 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base uses Rear Wheel Drive.