C200 vs Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase Comparison

Car Information

7.3

/

Engine / Motor

246 km/h

250 km/h

4

/

1998 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

4 Seater

4 Doors

/

4751 mm

5762 mm

1820 mm

2018 mm

1437 mm

1646 mm

2,865 mm

3552 mm

540 L

548 L

118 m

/

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

6.8 Km/L

66 L

100 L

10 Km/L

6.8 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.6

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

8

/

Transmission

9-speed Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

6.7 L - 6.8 L

TBD

453 BHP - 571 BHP

TBD

Automatic

TBD

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

TBD

4 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

6.7 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

/

4

/

204 BHP

563 BHP

310 Nm

900 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • C200

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPhantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose C200 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, C200 has a fuel consumption of 10, while Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase has a fuel consumption of 14.71. Therefore, C200 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, C200 has a wheelbase of 2,865 mm, while Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase has a wheelbase of 3552 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C200 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase uses Rear Wheel Drive.