C5 Aircross FEEL vs Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
208
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
4191
/
1794
/
1508
/
2601
/
405
Fuel Economy
14.1
18.5
/
50
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
1.6 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
165 BHP
150 BHP
/
250
Key Spec
/
1.0 L - 1.5 L
/
116 BHP - 150 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
C5 Aircross FEEL
Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Welcome Light
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAudi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C5 Aircross FEEL if you care more about power; choose Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C5 Aircross FEEL has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C5 Aircross FEEL has a wheelbase of No data, while Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) has a wheelbase of 2601. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C5 Aircross FEEL uses No data, while Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.