C5 Aircross FEEL vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
/
Flush Door
/
17
/
5
/
4318
/
1831
/
1662
/
2610
Fuel Economy
14.1
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Engine
1.6 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
165 BHP
111 BHP
/
1.5L
Key Spec
/
1.5 L - 1.5 L
/
111 BHP - 156
/
Automatic & CVT
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Exterior
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
C5 Aircross FEEL
Tiggo 4 Pro COM
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 4 Pro COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C5 Aircross FEEL if you care more about power; choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C5 Aircross FEEL has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C5 Aircross FEEL has a wheelbase of No data, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a wheelbase of 2610. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C5 Aircross FEEL uses No data, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM uses Front Drive.