C5 Aircross FEEL PACK vs Tiguan Life Plus 1.4L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1397 cc
/
European
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
/
17
/
5 Doors
/
4539
/
1842
/
1662
/
2681
/
652
/
200
Fuel Economy
14.1
14.4 Km/L
/
58
/
12Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
3-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger Airbag With Front Passenger Airbag Deactivation.Side Airbags For Outer Rear Seats Incl. Side Airbags In Front And Curtain Airbag System.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
7 Speed DSG
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
1.6 L
1.4
Gasoline
Gasoline
165 BHP
150 BHP
/
In-Line
/
4
/
250 Nm
Key Spec
/
1.4 L - 2.0 L
/
148 BHP - 220 BHP
/
7 Speed DSG & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
C5 Aircross FEEL PACK
Tiguan Life Plus 1.4L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful performance and efficient engines
- Comfortable and sophisticated interior design
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Limited storage space in comparison
- Relatively high maintenance costs
- Above average fuel consumption for some models
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C5 Aircross FEEL PACK if you care more about power; choose Tiguan Life Plus 1.4L if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C5 Aircross FEEL PACK has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Tiguan Life Plus 1.4L has a fuel consumption of 6.94. Therefore, Tiguan Life Plus 1.4L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C5 Aircross FEEL PACK has a wheelbase of No data, while Tiguan Life Plus 1.4L has a wheelbase of 2681. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C5 Aircross FEEL PACK uses No data, while Tiguan Life Plus 1.4L uses Front Wheel Drive.