C5 Comfort vs Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
/
4
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1381
/
17"
/
4400
5004 mm
1830
1978 mm
1588
1802 mm
2630
2900 mm
1075
470 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.7
9.4 Km/L
51
74 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
10.25"
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
4
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Torsion beam
/
Electric
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Ventilated
/
Solid
/
Electronic
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
156 - 197
250 BHP - 271 BHP
7 Speed DCT & 7DCT & CVT
9AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
156
271 BHP
230
340 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco / Sport
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
C5 Comfort
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Cool Box
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC5 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C5 Comfort if you care more about price; choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C5 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, C5 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C5 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2630, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C5 Comfort uses Front Drive, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.