Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) vs MG7 2.0T COM Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
195 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
1990 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4 Doors
4885 mm
4884
1840 mm
1889
1445 mm
1447
2824 mm
2778
493 L
/
/
1650
/
19
/
/
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
16.9
60 L
65
14.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Safety
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
9-Speed Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
Mcpherson
/
Multi-link
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
245/40 R19
/
245/40 R19
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
176 BHP - 298 BHP
185 - 261
8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & CVT
7DCT & 9-Speed Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
204 BHP
261
243 Nm
405 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP)
MG7 2.0T COM
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) if you care more about price; choose MG7 2.0T COM if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while MG7 2.0T COM has a fuel consumption of 5.92. Therefore, MG7 2.0T COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) has a wheelbase of 2824 mm, while MG7 2.0T COM has a wheelbase of 2778. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG7 2.0T COM uses Front Drive.