Camry XLE 2.5L vs Flying Spur 4.0T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
318 km/h
/
8
/
3956 cc
/
European
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4920
5316 mm
1840
2013 mm
1445
1483 mm
/
4 Doors
/
3194 mm
/
442 L
/
100 m
Fuel Economy
17.2
7.5 Km/L
60
98 L
/
7.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
Driver Seat
/
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
Driver, Front Passenger, Side & Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
8
/
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
4.0 L - 6.0 L
176 BHP - 298 BHP
500 BHP - 635 BHP
8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
201 BHP
542 BHP
240
770 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Camry XLE 2.5L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
Flying Spur 4.0T V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Camry XLE 2.5L if you care more about price; choose Flying Spur 4.0T V8 if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Camry XLE 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Flying Spur 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 13.33. Therefore, Camry XLE 2.5L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Camry XLE 2.5L has a wheelbase of No data, while Flying Spur 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3194 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Camry XLE 2.5L uses No data, while Flying Spur 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive.