CarteaCompare CarsCanyon AT4X 2.7T vs Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Chrome Pack)

Canyon AT4X 2.7T vs Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Chrome Pack) Comparison

Car Information

/

8.1

Engine / Motor

160 km/h

160

4

8

2698 cc

/

American

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

5415 mm

5.890

1838 mm

2.463

2072 mm

1.948

3327 mm

3.670

options. L

1568

271 m

/

/

Fuel Economy

7.2 Km/L

9.8

80 L

136

7.2 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

11.3

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

7

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.7 L

3.3 L - 6.2 L

310 BHP - 313 BHP

292 BHP - 770 BHP

Automatic

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

3 Seater - 6 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.7 L

5.0 L

Gasoline

Petrol

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

310 BHP

360 BHP

583 Nm

515

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Canyon AT4X 2.7T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Chrome Pack)

    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Rollover stability control
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCanyon AT4X 2.7T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Canyon AT4X 2.7T if you care more about price; choose Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Chrome Pack) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

GMC | Canyon AT4X 2.7T

VS

GMC | GMC Sierra LD 6.6L SLE

GMC | Canyon AT4X 2.7T

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Sport Pack)

GMC | Canyon AT4X 2.7T

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Chrome Pack)

GMC | Canyon AT4X 2.7T

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2019 3.3L V6 XLT Sport R/C

GMC | Canyon AT4X 2.7T

VS

Ford | Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Canyon AT4X 2.7T has a fuel consumption of 13.89, while Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Chrome Pack) has a fuel consumption of 10.2. Therefore, Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Chrome Pack) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Canyon AT4X 2.7T has a wheelbase of 3327 mm, while Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Chrome Pack) has a wheelbase of 3.670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Canyon AT4X 2.7T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Canyon AT4X 2.7T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Chrome Pack) uses All Wheel Drive.