Canyon AT4X 2.7T vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
175
4
5
2698 cc
/
American
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
5415 mm
5.362
1838 mm
1.976
2072 mm
1.816
3327 mm
3.221
options. L
1180
271 m
/
Fuel Economy
7.2 Km/L
11.1
80 L
80
7.2 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
11.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
7
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.7 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
310 BHP - 313 BHP
118 BHP - 392 BHP
Automatic
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.7 L
3.2 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
310 BHP
200 BHP
583 Nm
470
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Canyon AT4X 2.7T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Canyon AT4X 2.7T if you care more about price; choose Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Canyon AT4X 2.7T has a fuel consumption of 13.89, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Canyon AT4X 2.7T has a wheelbase of 3327 mm, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Canyon AT4X 2.7T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Canyon AT4X 2.7T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive.