Canyon AT4X Explore vs Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
180 km/h
4
4
2698 cc
1998 cc
American
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5415 mm
5370 mm
1838 mm
1918 mm
2072 mm
1884 mm
3327 mm
3270 mm
options. L
1200 L
271 m
230 m
Fuel Economy
7.2 Km/L
8 Km/L
80 L
80 L
7.2 Km/L
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Single
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
11.3
10
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
7
6
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.7 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
310 BHP - 313 BHP
118 BHP - 392 BHP
Automatic
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
Halogen
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.7 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Twin Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
310 BHP
168 BHP
583 Nm
405 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Canyon AT4X Explore
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Canyon AT4X Explore if you care more about price; choose Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Canyon AT4X Explore has a fuel consumption of 13.89, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Canyon AT4X Explore has a wheelbase of 3327 mm, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a wheelbase of 3270 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Canyon AT4X Explore, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Canyon AT4X Explore uses Four Wheel Drive, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) uses Four Wheel Drive.