Captiva LS vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

193 km/h

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

18

/

1051L

358 L

/

4355 mm

/

1810 mm

/

1625 mm

/

2670 mm

Fuel Economy

/

12.5 Km/L

/

63 L

/

12.5 Km/L

Comfort

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

Smart Key

/

Manual

/

/

✓

Interior

3.5

/

✓

/

diagonal display

/

Front Row Seats

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Safety

2 Front and sides

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Infotainment

10.4

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

4

/

Transmission

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Mcpherson

/

Wheels/brakes

✓

/

✓

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 3.0 L

2.0 L

144 BHP - 264 BHP

150 BHP

Automatic & CVT

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

HALOGEN

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

✓

Engine

1.5 T

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

144 BHP

150 BHP

/

197 Nm

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

Manual

/

✓

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Captiva LS

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCaptiva LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Captiva LS if you care more about price; choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Renault | Renault Koleos 2023 2.5L LE (4WD)

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Geely | Geely Monjaro 2024 2.0TD Premium GF (4WD)

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Captiva LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Captiva LS has a wheelbase of No data, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Captiva LS uses Front Wheel Drive, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive.