Captiva LS vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

/

8 s

/

189

/

390

/

4810*1925*1742

Dimensions

7 Seater

7

18

19

1051L

/

/

4810

/

1925

/

1742

/

2800

Fuel Economy

/

13

Comfort

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

/

/

/

Interior

3.5

10.25

/

diagonal display

10.25"

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

Triple

/

/

Safety

2 Front and sides

6

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.4

15.6

/

/

4

8

Battery/Charging

/

4

Transmission

CVT

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Mcpherson

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 3.0 L

-

144 BHP - 264 BHP

254 - 254

Automatic & CVT

AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

HALOGEN

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 T

2.0L

Gasoline

Gasoline

144 BHP

254

/

Turbocharge

/

2.0T GDI

/

390

Technologies

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

19 ADAS Functions

/

/

/

Eco + Normal + Sport

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Captiva LS

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • Tiggo 9 Comfort

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCaptiva LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Captiva LS if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Captiva LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Captiva LS has a wheelbase of No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Captiva LS uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.