Captiva LS vs MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX Comparison

Car Information

/

8.0

Engine / Motor

/

185

/

3

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

18

/

1051L

448

/

4314

/

1809

/

1624

/

2585

Fuel Economy

/

17.2

/

48

Comfort

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

3.5

/

/

diagonal display

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

2 Front and sides

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.4

/

/

/

/

/

4

/

/

/

/

Transmission

CVT

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Mcpherson

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 3200 L

1.3 L - 1498 L

144 BHP - 223 BHP

112 BHP - 168

Automatic & CVT

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

HALOGEN

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 T

1.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

144 BHP

160 BHP

/

230

Technologies

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Captiva LS

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Captiva LS if you care more about power; choose MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Maxus | D60 Executive 1.5L

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Toyota | Veloz GLX

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

GAC | GS3 EMZOOM Sport+

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Tucson 2023 1.6L T-GDI Smart (FWD)

Chevrolet | Captiva LS

VS

BAIC | X7 Honor-LV5

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Captiva LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Captiva LS has a wheelbase of No data, while MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX has a wheelbase of 2585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Captiva LS uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX uses Front Wheel Drive.