Captiva LS vs Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
1051L
375 L
/
4175 mm
/
1775 mm
/
1610 mm
/
2500 mm
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
47 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5
/
✓
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
2 Front and sides
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Mcpherson
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.0 L
1.6 L - 1586 L
144 BHP - 264 BHP
115 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
HALOGEN
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 T
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
144 BHP
115 BHP
/
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Captiva LS
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Captiva LS if you care more about power; choose Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Captiva LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Captiva LS has a wheelbase of No data, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a wheelbase of 2500 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Captiva LS uses Front Wheel Drive, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.