Captiva LT vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
1051L
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
/
1930 mm
/
1927 mm
/
2750 mm
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5
/
✓
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
4 Front and sides, 2 side curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.4
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Mcpherson
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.0 L
2.0 L
144 BHP - 264 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
HALOGEN
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
144 BHP
224 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Captiva LT
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Captiva LT if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Captiva LT has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Captiva LT has a wheelbase of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Captiva LT uses Front Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.