Captiva LT vs BYD e2 Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
/
18
/
1051L
/
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
Interior
3.5
/
✓
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
4 Front and sides, 2 side curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Mcpherson
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.0 L
TBD
144 BHP - 264 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
HALOGEN
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 T
/
Gasoline
/
144 BHP
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Captiva LT
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
BYD e2
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical fuel consumption
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
- Competitive price for specifications
Negative
- Average engine performance
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- A feature limited entertainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBYD e2
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Captiva LT if you care more about overall equipment; choose BYD e2 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Captiva LT has a fuel consumption of No data, while BYD e2 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Captiva LT has a wheelbase of No data, while BYD e2 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Captiva LT uses Front Wheel Drive, while BYD e2 uses No data.