Captiva LT vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
18
18
1051L
430 L
/
4571 mm
/
1855 mm
/
1719 mm
/
2708 mm
/
145
Fuel Economy
/
14.7 Km/L
/
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5
/
✓
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
4 Front and sides, 2 side curtain
2
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.4
14.1
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
6
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Mcpherson
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.0 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
144 BHP - 264 BHP
169 BHP - 220 BHP
Automatic & CVT
7DCT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
HALOGEN
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 T
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
144 BHP
171 BHP
/
275 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
Manual
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Captiva LT
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
RX5 1.5T STD
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRX5 1.5T STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Captiva LT if you care more about overall equipment; choose RX5 1.5T STD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Captiva LT has a fuel consumption of No data, while RX5 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Captiva LT has a wheelbase of No data, while RX5 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2708 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Captiva LT uses Front Wheel Drive, while RX5 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive.