CarteaCompare CarsCarnival 3.5L EX AT 12 vs M4 Passenger

Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 vs M4 Passenger Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

3.5 Liter

/

/

160

Dimensions

8

9

18

16

5155

5200

1995

1890

1740

1980

/

Sliding Door

/

2020

/

3080

/

160

Fuel Economy

72

80

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

4.2

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

7

2

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

6

Transmission

8 Speed AT

/

8 Speed AT

5MT

/

5

Chassis & Steering

MOTOR DRIVEN POWER STEERING

/

/

Dual Swing Arm Independent

/

Dependent steel leaf spring suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

/

235/60 R18

215/65 R16

235/60 R18

215/65 R16

/

Disc

/

Disc

Key Spec

3.3 L - 3.5 L

2.0 L

245 - 290

145 BHP

8 Speed AT & 8 Speed AT w/E-SHIFT (SWB) & Automatic & Automatic

5MT

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

2 - 9

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

3.5 Liters, 3,470 cc, 6 Cylinders, 24 VALVE, DOHC

2.0L VVT

6

/

268 BHP

145 BHP

268 hp / 6,400 rpm

/

33.8 Kg.m (331.5 Nm) /5,000 rpm

/

/

185

Technologies

/

/

Comfort - Eco - Sports - Smart

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
  • M4 Passenger

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious space and comfort in interior design
  • Advanced and reliable security features
  • Stylish design and high-quality materials

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • Control and driving are not accurate
  • The user interface for some features is complicated

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickM4 Passenger

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 if you care more about power; choose M4 Passenger if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

VS

Honda | Honda Odyssey 2019 3.5L EXL

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

VS

Honda | Honda Odyssey 2018 3.5L EXL

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

VS

Chrysler | Chrysler Pacifica 2020 3.6L V6 Touring L Plus

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

VS

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

VS

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX DLX 13

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a fuel consumption of No data, while M4 Passenger has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a wheelbase of No data, while M4 Passenger has a wheelbase of 3080. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 uses No data, while M4 Passenger uses No data.