CarteaCompare CarsCentury 5.0 vs E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon

Century 5.0 vs E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon Comparison

Car Information

/

3.8

/

1.0–0.9

/

58–60

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

/

8

/

4990 cc

/

Japanese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4 Doors

/

5335 mm

4,959

1930 mm

2,065

1505 mm

1,468

3090 mm

2,961

135 m

/

Fuel Economy

6 Km/L

/

110 L

60

6 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.25

/

/

/

/

Standard LCD

/

/

12

/

Transmission

Automatic

9-speed automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

5.0 L

3.0 L - 3.0 L

375 BHP

367 - 449

Automatic

9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

In-Line

5.0 L

3.0 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

None

/

4

/

375 BHP

449 + 163 HP

510 Nm

560 + 480

Technologies

/

/

/

Motor

/

480

/

Lithium-ion/21.2

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Century 5.0

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickCentury 5.0

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Century 5.0 if you care more about price; choose E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon if you care more about fuel economy.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Toyota | Century 5.0

    VS

    Maserati | Ghibli 3.0T V6 Modena

    Toyota | Century 5.0

    VS

    Maserati | Maserati Ghibli 2024 3.0T V6 Modena

    Toyota | Century 5.0

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Panamera 2024 4 E-Hybrid Executive

    Toyota | Century 5.0

    VS

    Audi | A8 L 60 TFSI quattro 4.0L (454 HP)

    Toyota | Century 5.0

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | CLS 450 4MATIC

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Century 5.0 has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon has a fuel consumption of 1.0–0.9. Therefore, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Century 5.0 has a wheelbase of 3090 mm, while E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon has a wheelbase of 2,961. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Century 5.0, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Century 5.0 uses All Wheel Drive, while E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon uses No data.