Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
160 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4160
4490 mm
1810
1874 mm
1670
1613 mm
2560
2750 mm
348
/
Fuel Economy
13.9
/
52
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
123 BHP
305 BHP
160
680 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
/
TBD
/
Electric
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable
- Keyless Entry
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2560, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.