Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable vs H2 1.5T Intelligent Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
170 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4160
4335 mm
1810
1814 mm
1670
1695 mm
2560
2560 mm
348
500 L
Fuel Economy
13.9
12.2 Km/L
52
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L
1.5 L
123 BHP
147 BHP - 150 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
123 BHP
148 BHP
160
210 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable
- Keyless Entry
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
H2 1.5T Intelligent
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH2 1.5T Intelligent
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable if you care more about fuel economy; choose H2 1.5T Intelligent if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2560, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive, while H2 1.5T Intelligent uses Front Wheel Drive.