CarteaCompare CarsChangan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) vs CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) vs CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180

185 km/h

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4160

4949 mm

1810

1930 mm

1670

1790 mm

2560

2810 mm

348

/

Fuel Economy

13.9

10.5 Km/L

52

74 L

/

10.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.6 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

123 BHP

233 - 233

Automatic

8-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.6 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

123 BHP

233 BHP

160

360 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickChangan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) if you care more about price; choose CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Changan | Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD)

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2020 1.8L Classic

Changan | Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD)

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2021 1.8L Classic

Changan | Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD)

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2018 1.8L Standard (Full Option)

Changan | Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD)

VS

Renault | Renault Captur 2018 1.2L SE

Changan | Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD)

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2560, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.