Changan CS35 2019 1.6L Basic (2WD) vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
/
4
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4160
5209
1810
2010
1670
1731
2560
3110
348
/
Fuel Economy
14.7
/
52
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L
/
123 BHP
429 BHP - 543 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
4 Seater - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km - 515 km
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
123 BHP
429 BHP
160
600
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS35 2019 1.6L Basic (2WD)
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS35 2019 1.6L Basic (2WD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS35 2019 1.6L Basic (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS35 2019 1.6L Basic (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2560, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS35 2019 1.6L Basic (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.