Changan CS35 2020 1.6L Full Option (2WD) vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison

Car Information

/

12.8

Engine / Motor

180

170

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4160

4323

1810

1809

1670

1653

2560

2585

348

359/1166

/

1318

/

17

/

5

/

145

Fuel Economy

13.9

17.2

52

45

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Drivers and Passenger Airbag

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

10.1

/

/

/

4

Transmission

Automatic

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

/

McPherson Front Shock Absorber

/

H Torsional Beam

Wheels/brakes

/

Disc

/

Disc

/

215/55 R17

/

215/55 R17

Key Spec

1.6 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

123 BHP

112 BHP - 168

Automatic

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

Engine

1.6 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

123 BHP

118 BHP

160

180

/

88

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Changan CS35 2020 1.6L Full Option (2WD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • ZS 1.5L STD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's PickZS 1.5L STD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Changan CS35 2020 1.6L Full Option (2WD) if you care more about power; choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS35 2020 1.6L Full Option (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, ZS 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Changan CS35 2020 1.6L Full Option (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2560, while ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ZS 1.5L STD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS35 2020 1.6L Full Option (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive.