CarteaCompare CarsChangan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4650

4771 mm

1850

1870 mm

1705

1828 mm

2700

2790 mm

590

/

Fuel Economy

11.4

10 Km/L

58

/

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.8 L

2.0 L

175 BHP

215 BHP

Automatic

TBD

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.8 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

175 BHP

215 BHP

230

280 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Changan | Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Changan | Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Changan | Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Changan | Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Changan | Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2700, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.