Changan CS75 2018 Fashion (2WD) vs C4 Feel Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
200 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4650
4360 mm
1850
2032 mm
1705
1525 mm
2700
2670 mm
590
380 L
Fuel Economy
11.4
17.9 Km/L
58
50 L
/
17.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
1.2 L - 1.6 L
175 BHP
155 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
175 BHP
155 BHP
230
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS75 2018 Fashion (2WD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
C4 Feel
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC4 Feel
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS75 2018 Fashion (2WD) if you care more about interior space; choose C4 Feel if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS75 2018 Fashion (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77, while C4 Feel has a fuel consumption of 5.59. Therefore, C4 Feel is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS75 2018 Fashion (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2700, while C4 Feel has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan CS75 2018 Fashion (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS75 2018 Fashion (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while C4 Feel uses Front Wheel Drive.