Changan CS75 2024 Changan CS75 2024 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD) vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
10.0
10.9
✓
✓
Engine / Motor
180
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
✓
4.650
4.314
1.850
1.809
1.705
1.624
2.700
2.585
590
448
Fuel Economy
11.4
17.2
58
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
175 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Petrol
177 BHP
112 BHP
245
150
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS75 2024 Changan CS75 2024 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Active braking
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS75 2024 Changan CS75 2024 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD) if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS75 2024 Changan CS75 2024 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS75 2024 Changan CS75 2024 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2.700, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan CS75 2024 Changan CS75 2024 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS75 2024 Changan CS75 2024 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.