Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
200 km/h
4
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4949
4760 mm
1930
1930 mm
1790
1927 mm
2810
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
10.5
10 Km/L
74
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L
233 - 233
223 BHP - 342 BHP
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
233 BHP
224 BHP
360
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.