Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD Comparison

Car Information

9.8

4.5

Engine / Motor

185

200

4

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

4949

4.880

1930

1.970

1790

1.601

2810

2.975

/

489

Fuel Economy

10.5

/

74

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

680

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

/

233 BHP

570 BHP - 599 BHP

Automatic

TBD

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

7 Seater

5 Seater

/

TBD

/

650 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

233 BHP

570 BHP

360

650

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Double

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Door Reflectors
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAvatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about interior space; choose Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Changan | Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

VS

Changan | Changan CS85 2023 2.0T GDI Premium

Changan | Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

VS

Changan | Changan CS85 2024 2.0T GDI Premium

Changan | Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

VS

Subaru | Subaru XV 2022 2.0L-S EyeSight

Changan | Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

VS

Subaru | Subaru XV 2021 2.0L-S EyeSight

Changan | Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

VS

Kia | Kia Sorento 2024 2.5L Base Option (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a wheelbase of 2.975. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.